Skip to main content
Deliver directly to undertaker!
According to
AP: "Worshippers at black churches in 20 states will be urged this weekend to consider organ donation. The program, Linkages to Life, is aimed at raising awareness about organ donation among blacks, who suffer higher rates of diseases that damage the liver and kidneys."

This is not going to work. And it isn't because the religious leaders and others aren't trying or don't care.

1) Altruism motivates some people, but not enough to donate their vital organs. Thankfully we don't rely on altruism to motivate people to get up every day to go to work, to sell food to us, to play pro basketball or football, or for medical breakthroughs. We know that altruism doesn't work in most endeavors in life, but for some reason we believe (or foolishly hope) that it will work when it comes to people agreeing to have their bodies cut up after death or loved ones having to make that decision shortly after that loved one has expired. No wonder that there has been an organ shortage for as long as humans have known how to transplant organs. When important stuff is free, then everyone wants some.

2) The extra factor with blacks is fear of racism. At the end of the AP article, deacon Richard Adams, an organ transplant recipient, is quoted as saying, "Coming from a black environment, we don't like to give up our organs." Mr. Adams should have finished that sentence with the words, "for free!" AP didn't dig, but I'll speculate that there is one main reason that blacks don't like to give up their organs: fear that white doctors would kill or let blacks die prematurely so that they could get their organs.

I'm sure there are many whites and middle-class blacks who won't believe that. And if you think I'm making that up, just remember that magic word that conspiracy theorists haul out to shut down critics: Tuskegee. And you can now add a new word: Katrina.

You say that doctors wouldn't start stealing black body parts, and you'll hear about the syphilis experiment on blacks. Or about the
interferon medical breakthroughs of the 1980s, in which some charged that black babies were being killed in the late 1970s because they had a special medicine in their genitals that could cure cancer (James Baldwin and Dick Gregory supposedly were spreading that rumor).

It wouldn't take long for "
presumed consent" to lead to some cases of black people having their organs or body parts taken--James Baldwin might come back to life to team up with Dick Gregory to help spread the idea that the Klan was paying white doctors to kill off black patients. There are some doctors who have argued that they should be able to TAKE organs of people who didn't make it clear that they didn't want that to happen. And we see this from time to time when doctors get caught harvesting heads, hearts, other vital parts. Incredible. It supposedly is unethical for people to sell their own organs or body parts, but we've even got American doctors debating whether it is ethical for doctors to confiscate organs and body parts.

3) Right now, with just a few exceptions, it is only the medical people making money off transplanted organs. And the
proposals for paying people for organs pay them so little that it isn't a real incentive. $300? Forgetaboutit! Keeping the stipend low supposedly is to prevent from poor people from lining up to sell their organs. Okay, fine. With altruism, we end up with a long line of people waiting for organs. With a free market, we would probably end up with a line of people agreeing to sell their organs upon death, and others taking a chance that they can get by without an organ when a celebrity offers them $100,000 or more for something like a kidney.

Of course, there would be nothing to prevent altruistic people from donating their organs. If nothing else, donating their organs in an open market could help keep the cost of other organs on the market low.

4) For the first time in my life I've thought about getting a tattoo or even a series of tattoos. I'm debating the following:

"Do not remove parts upon death."
"Presumed Consent DENIED!"
"Not to be Donated or Dismembered!"
"Keep Intact!"
"Deliver Directly to Undertaker!"

CJL

Linked by Booker Rising, Black Electorate

Popular posts from this blog

2014-02-14 Yeon-Mi Park`s debut

Yeonmi Park, February 14, 2014, making her debut! Yesterday I was one of the speakers at a special session on North Korean refugees at the Canadian Maple International School. Wow, it was a wonderful time! * Yeon-Mi Park delivered her first major speech in English. She was wonderful! She told her story (35 minute speech without notes), discussed different aspects of North Korea, and then handled questions from students for more than an hour. She did seem to be nervous at the beginning-she took a deep breath just as she started, looked at me, then told her story from her heart. * Returning from the speech, I told Yeonmi that she had star potential. She told me that she didn't believe it, but I told her that the way she handled Q&A and told her story, I would be lucky to have her still returning my phone calls within a year. * The students had many questions. They have been learning about North Korea. They are now reading "Escape from Camp 14" featuring Shin Dong-h...

Open door to N. Koreans (Korea Times, January 16, 2013) by Casey Lartigue, Jr.

Open door to N. Koreans By Casey Lartigue, Jr. Last Dec. 12, I fired off an opinion piece of about 1,500 words to the Washington Post. It easily could have been 1,600 words, but I deleted all of the curse words. The day before, I had learned that the United States government had rejected visa applications by three of the students at the Mulmangcho School for North Korean refugee adolescents. Mulmangcho (meaning, ``forget-me-not”) is a small alternative school located in Yeoju, more than an hour south of Seoul. It opened last September with 11 former North Korean children who are orphans or are disadvantaged in some other way. It was founded by former national assembly member Park Sun-young and a distinguished board of directors. Why were the youngsters rejected? The explanation I got: 1) The U.S. government is concerned that they might not return to South Korea and 2) there was a question about their refugee status because they didn’t have pr...

Park Chung-hee: Dictator or benevolent autocrat? (The Korea Herald, July 20, 2011)

The Korea Herald published my analysis of Willam Easterly's paper "Benevolent Autocrats." Check it out at the CFE Website . Easterly questions if "benevolent autocrats" really deserve credit for high economic growth. The Idiots' Collective calls it "a must-read" piece. I agree. [Casey Lartigue, Jr.] Park Chung-hee: Dictator or benevolent autocrat? It ain’t necessarily so. That’s what New York University economics professor William Easterly essentially says about crediting “benevolent autocrats” like South Korea’s Park Chung-hee for high growth rates. In “Benevolent Autocrats,” a provocative working paper posted in May, Easterly 1) argues that economists should be skeptical of the “benevolent autocrat” theory; (2) questions whether benevolent autocrats truly deserve credit for growth; (3) and concedes he is making a losing argument because cognitive biases lead many to believe in benevolent autocrats regardless...

2015-04-25 First-time TNKR speaker

  When I hear people say that South Koreans don't care about North Koreans, I have three main responses. 1) North Koreans are one of many groups that South Koreans don't care about. 2) The ones who do care, care a lot! Let's focus on getting them more involved rather focusing on the ones not involved. 3) It may just be that those of us engaged in activism for NK refugees need to try different methods rather than dismissing or denouncing others for not getting involved... http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2015/01/626_155820.html Last night, Saturday April 25, 2015, I met with two South Koreans to help a North Korean refugee get ready for her first public speech. Thanks so much, TNKR co-director Lee Eunkoo and TNKR coach Clare JH Yun! It will be a challenge, will be this particular speaker's first speech in English. She is also a newcomer to English. But her determination, wow! She is studying with a few coaches in the Teach North Korean Refugees project. I wish...

복날

Tomorrow is 복날 ( bok nal ). It seems to mean that it is start of the dog days of summer. So we'll be eating 삼계탕 ( sam gye tang, which is chicken broth with ginseng) to celebrate the day before the rest of Korea does so. Update #1 : You must literally rip the chicken apart with chopsticks and a spoon. It helps to wear a bib so it won't get on your clothes. The food is cooked after you order it or call ahead with reservations . Update #2 : It is pronounced by me as bok nal , but when I say it Koreans around me don't understand until I pronounce it as " bok nallllllll ." This is a common problem with the little Korean that I can say. I'll say it, Koreans will say I speak Korean well, then ask each other in Korean, "What did he say?" Update #3 : James explains that I am probably pronouncing bok nal incorrectly. Instead, it is probably better to pronounce it "bong nahl ." I have the feeling I still won't be understood unless I say ...