Skip to main content

Flashback: Fights over seating arrangements between the two Koreas


The New York Times has the kind of article I like--a review of an issue/event that includes a bit of history to remind readers to be skeptical of today's optimistic headlines.
During border talks decades ago, the sides took the competition over protocol and appearances to the extreme, with North Korean military officers secretly adding inches to the legs of their chairs so they would look taller than their counterparts across the table from South Korea and the United States.
In those cold-war-era meetings, the sides usually exchanged invectives and retorts. But they also sometimes persisted in silence — for over 11 hours in one session in 1969 — challenging the other side to speak first.
In the best-known contest of pride on the divided peninsula, North and South Korea once engaged in a race over which country could raise its national flag higher over the heavily fortified border. That battle was eventually settled with the North beating the South; today, the North’s flagpole stands over 500 feet tall, beating the rival South’s by roughly 200 feet.
Of course, they can't mention everything in every article, but I would just like to add the previous battles over the seating arrangements at such meetings.

From March 1998:

Seating Squabble Gets Peace Talks Off To Slow Start 
March 17, 1998|By From Tribune News Services.


THE KOREAS — Talks to ease tensions on the Korean peninsula became mired in procedural wrangling Monday in Geneva, with delegates quibbling about seating arrangements and the format of the peace talks.
The discussions to forge a permanent peace treaty between North and South Korea were delayed several hours before delegations sat down around a square table.
Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Chen Jian, who headed the meeting, said the atmosphere was good-- "eventually."

From Voice of America, March 18, 1998 (in all caps, as posted)
NO PROGRESS HAS BEEN REPORTED IN THIS SECOND ROUND OF TALKS.
BUT OBSERVERS SAY NORTH KOREA'S WILLINGNESS TO ENGAGE IN A
TWO-WAY DIALOGUE WITH ITS SOUTHERN NEIGHBOR SHOULD WARM THE ATMOSPHERE. 
THE TALKS GOT OFF TO A ROCKY START ON MONDAY. DISCUSSIONS WERE
DELAYED FOR MORE THAN FIVE HOURS WHILE THE DELEGATES SORTED OUT A DISPUTE ABOUT SEATING ARRANGEMENTS. NORTH KOREA FINALLY GOT ITS WAY AND WAS ALLOWED TO SIT OPPOSITE THE AMERICAN DELEGATION INSTEAD OF FACING THE SOUTH KOREANS AS IT HAD DURING THE FIRST ROUND OF TALKS IN DECEMBER. 
ALTHOUGH TWO DAYS OF PROCEDURAL WRANGLING HAVE FINALLY BEEN SORTED OUT, OBSERVERS SAY NOT MUCH OF SUBSTANCE HAS YET BEEN DISCUSSED.

Koreas summit anniversary halts over VIP seating arrangements

Posted on : Jun.16,2007 17:11 KSTModified on : Jun.17,2007 20:43 KST
North Korea effectively halted all scheduled events at a joint celebration marking the seventh anniversary of the historic inter-Korean summit by preventing a South Korean lawmaker from sitting in the VIP area at a "unity event," pool reports said Friday.
The celebration in Pyongyang stopped when organizers told Rep. Park Kye-dong that he would not be seated with other dignitaries.
The two-term lawmaker from the conservative Grand National Party (GNP) is part of the 284-member South Korean delegation that arrived in the North Korean capital on Thursday.
The incident occurred in the morning at the People's Palace of Culture, when North Korean officials blocked Park's entry.
"The North gave no reason why the GNP lawmaker could not sit in the VIP area," said a spokesman for the South Korean delegation.He added that organizers did not listen, even though the South Korean side told them that seating arrangements were agreed upon in advance.
In recent months, Pyongyang has consistently blasted the conservative party and warned that if its candidate wins the upcoming presidential election in December, hostilities between the two Koreas could flare up.


Jung Yeon-Je/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
South Korean activists prepare to set an effigy of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on fire during an anti-Pyongyang rally in Seoul on Wednesday.

Popular posts from this blog

Get rid of that watermelon!

Part 1: When I was a youngster I used to collect Confederate money, posters and photographs with caricatures of blacks, and "No blacks allowed signs." I loved the money because it was a reminder of how far the sorry Confederacy had fallen. I had one poster of a dark-skinned black boy munching on a watermelon. I would look at that small poster and wonder, "What in the world is wrong with anyone wanting to eat watermelon?" Yes, white people, I'm talking to you. Your parents, grandparents, and other ancestors who thought making fun of blacks for eating watermelon were crazy ! Even people who say that nothing has changed in race relations must acknowledge that the many stereotypes of blacks are no longer prevalent. But then, there are also some ready to remind us of days-gone-by by debunking stuff that doesn't need to be debunked today. According to the Washington Post: The sound you just heard was yet another racial stereotype going kersplat ! Some ...

Common Sense on North Korea (Korea Times, April 2, 2012)

By Casey Lartigue, Jr. As interesting as Kookmin University professor Andrei Lankov’s writings are, there is nothing quite like attending one of his lectures. He can barely restrain himself behind the podium, often pointing and waving his arms. I also enjoy his unscripted speeches, but his answers in Q&A sessions are like the difference between watching Michael Jordan shoot baskets in warm-ups and an actual game. I have finally discovered the secret behind Lankov’s consistently solid analysis about North Korea: Use common sense. At an Asan Institute conference last summer, he argued that North Korea watchers should try to understand North Korea from its perspective. Don’t most people know that you must understand the mindset of others you are dealing with? Yet, common sense in theory gets ignored politically. From the North Korean perspective, nuclear weapons are the best thing they’ve got going. They will NOT give them up easily, even if President Obama ...

Rich talking back

The rich are talked about very often in negative terms, but how often do the rich respond in kind? Australian billionaire Gina Rinehart, who inherited most of her money but apparently has also done very well with it, recently railed against class warfare and had some advice for the non-rich : "There is no monopoly on becoming a millionaire," she writes. "If you're jealous of those with more money, don't just sit there and complain. Do something to make more money yourself - spend less time drinking, or smoking and socializing and more time working."   She complained about politicians raising taxes, regulations that slow investment, and other anti-business policies that harm the poor. "If you want to help the poor and our next generation, make investment, reinvenstment and businesses welcome."

Park Jin welcoming remarks to FSI (and Casey Lartigue)

  National Assembly member Park Jin makes the welcoming remarks at FSI's conference featuring North Korean diplomats. Park Jin | Greeting message to FSI and Casey Lartigue mention - YouTube

Random photos from today

I went walking around today. Whereas some people like to go walking in the mountains, I enjoy walking around in the city. Well, not D.C. or other cities with many homeless, crazy and/or armed people walking around... * * * Here's where I had lunch today. About $1.90 for a hamburger hamberger.   * * * Ha-ha! Bet you never would have guessed that Batman is a drinking place in Korea! * * * Man Clinic? The Koreans walking by seemed to be very curious about why I was taking a photo of a "Man Clinic." They may know something I don't know...Actually, I wasn't curious enough to go in and find out what it was... * * * Right down the street from the Man Clinic...there's a Love Shop! I love the euphemism. "Love Shop" sounds much better than Sex Shop. I'm guessing that if you don't go to the "Love Shop" to buy condoms that you may need to visit the Man Clinic a short time later? * * * Nobo...