Skip to main content

Flashback: Fights over seating arrangements between the two Koreas


The New York Times has the kind of article I like--a review of an issue/event that includes a bit of history to remind readers to be skeptical of today's optimistic headlines.
During border talks decades ago, the sides took the competition over protocol and appearances to the extreme, with North Korean military officers secretly adding inches to the legs of their chairs so they would look taller than their counterparts across the table from South Korea and the United States.
In those cold-war-era meetings, the sides usually exchanged invectives and retorts. But they also sometimes persisted in silence — for over 11 hours in one session in 1969 — challenging the other side to speak first.
In the best-known contest of pride on the divided peninsula, North and South Korea once engaged in a race over which country could raise its national flag higher over the heavily fortified border. That battle was eventually settled with the North beating the South; today, the North’s flagpole stands over 500 feet tall, beating the rival South’s by roughly 200 feet.
Of course, they can't mention everything in every article, but I would just like to add the previous battles over the seating arrangements at such meetings.

From March 1998:

Seating Squabble Gets Peace Talks Off To Slow Start 
March 17, 1998|By From Tribune News Services.


THE KOREAS — Talks to ease tensions on the Korean peninsula became mired in procedural wrangling Monday in Geneva, with delegates quibbling about seating arrangements and the format of the peace talks.
The discussions to forge a permanent peace treaty between North and South Korea were delayed several hours before delegations sat down around a square table.
Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Chen Jian, who headed the meeting, said the atmosphere was good-- "eventually."

From Voice of America, March 18, 1998 (in all caps, as posted)
NO PROGRESS HAS BEEN REPORTED IN THIS SECOND ROUND OF TALKS.
BUT OBSERVERS SAY NORTH KOREA'S WILLINGNESS TO ENGAGE IN A
TWO-WAY DIALOGUE WITH ITS SOUTHERN NEIGHBOR SHOULD WARM THE ATMOSPHERE. 
THE TALKS GOT OFF TO A ROCKY START ON MONDAY. DISCUSSIONS WERE
DELAYED FOR MORE THAN FIVE HOURS WHILE THE DELEGATES SORTED OUT A DISPUTE ABOUT SEATING ARRANGEMENTS. NORTH KOREA FINALLY GOT ITS WAY AND WAS ALLOWED TO SIT OPPOSITE THE AMERICAN DELEGATION INSTEAD OF FACING THE SOUTH KOREANS AS IT HAD DURING THE FIRST ROUND OF TALKS IN DECEMBER. 
ALTHOUGH TWO DAYS OF PROCEDURAL WRANGLING HAVE FINALLY BEEN SORTED OUT, OBSERVERS SAY NOT MUCH OF SUBSTANCE HAS YET BEEN DISCUSSED.

Koreas summit anniversary halts over VIP seating arrangements

Posted on : Jun.16,2007 17:11 KSTModified on : Jun.17,2007 20:43 KST
North Korea effectively halted all scheduled events at a joint celebration marking the seventh anniversary of the historic inter-Korean summit by preventing a South Korean lawmaker from sitting in the VIP area at a "unity event," pool reports said Friday.
The celebration in Pyongyang stopped when organizers told Rep. Park Kye-dong that he would not be seated with other dignitaries.
The two-term lawmaker from the conservative Grand National Party (GNP) is part of the 284-member South Korean delegation that arrived in the North Korean capital on Thursday.
The incident occurred in the morning at the People's Palace of Culture, when North Korean officials blocked Park's entry.
"The North gave no reason why the GNP lawmaker could not sit in the VIP area," said a spokesman for the South Korean delegation.He added that organizers did not listen, even though the South Korean side told them that seating arrangements were agreed upon in advance.
In recent months, Pyongyang has consistently blasted the conservative party and warned that if its candidate wins the upcoming presidential election in December, hostilities between the two Koreas could flare up.


Jung Yeon-Je/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
South Korean activists prepare to set an effigy of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on fire during an anti-Pyongyang rally in Seoul on Wednesday.

Popular posts from this blog

Helping North Koreans 'strike the blow' (Korea Times)

H ave you ever engaged in action not because you were sure it would change the world, but to satisfy your own heart? That, I emailed to an American friend, is why I have joined the effort to help North Koreans who are trying to escape from their homeland. I can’t change the direction of policy in North Korea or China but I can row the boat I am sitting in rather than lamenting that I can’t steer the yachts somewhere else. So I have tried to do what I can: Attending protests in front of the Chinese embassy in Seoul (and I plan to do so when I visit America in April); donating money to the Citizens’ Alliance for North Korean Human Rights ( www.nkhumanrights.or.kr ); educating myself, writing articles and emailing friends; and, as a member of the board of trustees, I recently submitted a resolution to the Frederick Douglass Memorial and Historical Association (FDMHA) in Washington, D.C., to try to call attention to the plight of North Koreans. Our organization’s missi...

Chang Ha-Joon's foolish consistency (Korea Times, January 1, 2013)

By Casey Lartigue, Jr. Is the sky blue? Is the ocean water? If you suspect those are trick questions, you are right. The sky isn’t always blue ― it is reddish at sunset, dark at midnight, gray on an overcast day. The ocean isn’t water ― there’s also fish, plant life, submarines, dissolved minerals, surfboards, sunken ships, even people swimming in it sometimes. As Hoover Institution scholar Thomas Sowell wrote in his 1996 book ``The Vision of the Anointed,” people who use “all-or-nothing” reasoning can deny a statement because it is not 100 percent true in every circumstance. Such word games might be fun for college students or debaters, but there are some distinguished people who are respected for making such childish arguments about serious issues. In his book ``23 Things They Don’t Tell you About Capitalism,” Cambridge University economist Chang Ha-Joon argues that 1) “[T]here is really no such thing as a free market” and 2) “The free market doesn’t exis...

2020-04-26 "May I choose more teachers?" TNKR Matching session #102

2020-04-26, TNKR Matching session #102 The Teach North Korean Refugees Global Education Center (TNKR) humbly began in March 2013 with 5 tutors and 5 NK refugees being matched together. We held that first session at a TOZ business center in Gangnam. Seven years later, TNKR has now matched 455 North Korean refugees with 1,027 tutors, coaches, and mentors. Today we held our 102nd Language Matching session at our slightly expanded office near the Sangsu Subway Station. Instead of just being something that Casey and Eunkoo did short-term, TNKR is now an official organization in both South Korea and the USA, we have been featured in media and by other organizations (just yesterday, we were featured by KOTESOL), and we have fans and donors from around the world.

"Yoegi Anjuseyo!"

* I have a short reflection in today's Korea Times about an encounter with an unfriendly looking Korean man on the subway. It was a reminder not to be too quick in judging people in Korea. 09-13-2011 16:47 'Yeogi Anjeuseyo!' By Casey Lartigue Jr. The recent incident in which an American English teacher bullied an elderly Korean man and other passengers on the bus reminded me of a more pleasing incident from years ago. I was on the subway, taking the train outside of Seoul for a work assignment. I have the habit of standing on the subway to strategically position myself near the doors in case my stop magically appears. On that particular day, there was a Korean man STARING at me. Not just looking at me, but intensely staring at me. He had an incredible frown on his face. Not just for one stop, but for several stops the guy just kept staring at me. If I had known more Korean then I would have been able to curse him ...

2020-11-26 My basketball story

This photo was uploaded today by my aunt Annette. This was back in the day, when 1) I had a head full of hair and 2) played basketball a lot. That first year of playing organized basketball, I focused on playing defense. It seemed that everyone wanted to shoot the ball, so I passed the ball and played defense. I probably led the league in steals, rebounds and blocked shots. I enjoyed taking on the best player from the other team, I felt like I would get better, quickly. The second year, I was a different player. I will never forget the first game that second year--we lost 29 to 26, I scored 18 points. I probably led the universe in scoring that second year, although we didn't win much. One thing I learned from that experience is that one great player 9 (at least in his own mind) can't beat a team. An eye injury ended my pro career before it began, to this day I still have floaters in my eyes because of the injury. I started wearing glasses, but the problem never went away. On t...