Skip to main content

Walk - or run - away from Gaeseong (The Korea Times, July 9, 2013) by Casey Lartigue, Jr.


Walk - or run - away from Gaeseong

By Casey Lartigue, Jr.

The South Korean government is on the verge of snatching defeat from the ''jaws of victory" as it agreed to reopen the joint Gaeseong Industrial Complex.

Although I support a ''sunshine approach" in dealing with North Korea, I do believe the South Korean government made the right decision to withdraw from the Gaeseong complex in April when the North Koreans started acting like damned fools, yet again. The South Korean government pledged to financially support the South Korean companies suffering losses (an estimated $1 billion).

I oppose providing subsidies for businesses, but in this case, it is the best option to make a clean break. Offer payoffs to the South Korean companies doing business in the complex, then the South Korean government should wipe its hands of the complex. That's right, walk ― if not run ― away from the Gaeseong complex.

If South Korean businesses want to do business with the North Korean regime, they should not be blocked. It is inevitable that the North Koreans will use the complex as part of its ongoing game of chicken with the South and that the South Korean companies will eventually have their property seized or shut down.

The problem is that the taxpayers lose their shirts right along with those South Korean companies when the South Korean government stays involved.

I have watched South Korea long enough to know that the government here can't break its habit of being involved in everything, even having Cabinet meetings discussing whether or not men should be defined as hostesses or the appropriate lengths of skirts of ladies.

So the South Korean government will work with the North Korean regime to reopen the complex and maintain the guarantees for South Korean companies. Then the next time the North Koreans shut down the complex, the price tag will be $10 billion or some other ridiculous amount.

To be clear, I support a sunshine policy allowing businesses, individuals and charitable organizations to deal with the North Korean regime. But shouldn't it be obvious by now that the two Koreas won't come to a meaningful agreement?

The New York Times recently took a stroll through history, writing about squabbles between the two Koreas at their peace talks: ''During border talks decades ago, the sides took the competition over protocol and appearances to the extreme, with North Korean military officers secretly adding inches to the legs of their chairs so they would look taller than their counterparts across the table from South Korea and the United States. In those cold-war-era meetings, the sides usually exchanged invectives and retorts.

''But they also sometimes persisted in silence ― for over 11 hours in one session in 1969 ― challenging the other side to speak first. In the best-known contest of pride on the divided peninsula, North and South Korea once engaged in a race over which country could raise its national flag higher over the heavily fortified border. That battle was eventually settled with the North beating the South; today, the North's flagpole stands over 500 feet tall, beating the rival South's by roughly 200 feet."

Of course, there are many more examples not mentioned, such as high level meetings being delayed or halted because of disputes over seating arrangements.

I mention that because Gaeseong is just another bargaining tool between the two Korean governments, a chess game being played according to North Korea's rules.

Stephen Linton of the Eugene Bell Foundation pointed out at a Cato Institute event in 2010 that countries tend to adopt North Korea's tactics. ''South Korea tries to approach North Korea the way North Korea approaches South Korea, by funneling everything through government ministries, by strangling in a sense or denying its private sector full participation," Linton said. The result is too much government, not enough private sector activity in dealing with North Korea.

The South Korean government can, in this case, walk away from the industrial complex, cut the guarantees, and allow businesses to deal directly with the North Koreans.

Photo Casey Lartigue took during Prof. Lankov's presentation.

At his office, getting his critical but helpful advice about my projects.

I connected him with 10 Magazine for a speech in July 2013, then went to the subway to direct him to the location.

I arranged for Prof. Lankov and some refugees to be in a PBS special. He was on the phone, so they asked me to sit in his seat for a few minutes so they could adjust the lighting or whatever...

Prof. Lankov

Making!

HIS!

POINT!
Introducing Prof. Lankov to Yeonmi Park and Stephanie Choi (one of Yeonmi's 19 teachers in the Teach North Korean Refugees project that I am co-director of.


September 2011, Center for Free Enterprise. Prof. Lankov agreed to come over to my office to give a speech although he had no idea who I was.

Popular posts from this blog

2020-04-26 "May I choose more teachers?" TNKR Matching session #102

2020-04-26, TNKR Matching session #102 The Teach North Korean Refugees Global Education Center (TNKR) humbly began in March 2013 with 5 tutors and 5 NK refugees being matched together. We held that first session at a TOZ business center in Gangnam. Seven years later, TNKR has now matched 455 North Korean refugees with 1,027 tutors, coaches, and mentors. Today we held our 102nd Language Matching session at our slightly expanded office near the Sangsu Subway Station. Instead of just being something that Casey and Eunkoo did short-term, TNKR is now an official organization in both South Korea and the USA, we have been featured in media and by other organizations (just yesterday, we were featured by KOTESOL), and we have fans and donors from around the world.
Read more

Helping North Koreans 'strike the blow' (Korea Times)

H ave you ever engaged in action not because you were sure it would change the world, but to satisfy your own heart? That, I emailed to an American friend, is why I have joined the effort to help North Koreans who are trying to escape from their homeland. I can’t change the direction of policy in North Korea or China but I can row the boat I am sitting in rather than lamenting that I can’t steer the yachts somewhere else. So I have tried to do what I can: Attending protests in front of the Chinese embassy in Seoul (and I plan to do so when I visit America in April); donating money to the Citizens’ Alliance for North Korean Human Rights ( www.nkhumanrights.or.kr ); educating myself, writing articles and emailing friends; and, as a member of the board of trustees, I recently submitted a resolution to the Frederick Douglass Memorial and Historical Association (FDMHA) in Washington, D.C., to try to call attention to the plight of North Koreans. Our organization’s missi...
Read more

Park Jin welcoming remarks to FSI (and Casey Lartigue)

  National Assembly member Park Jin makes the welcoming remarks at FSI's conference featuring North Korean diplomats. Park Jin | Greeting message to FSI and Casey Lartigue mention - YouTube
Read more

2020-11-26 My basketball story

This photo was uploaded today by my aunt Annette. This was back in the day, when 1) I had a head full of hair and 2) played basketball a lot. That first year of playing organized basketball, I focused on playing defense. It seemed that everyone wanted to shoot the ball, so I passed the ball and played defense. I probably led the league in steals, rebounds and blocked shots. I enjoyed taking on the best player from the other team, I felt like I would get better, quickly. The second year, I was a different player. I will never forget the first game that second year--we lost 29 to 26, I scored 18 points. I probably led the universe in scoring that second year, although we didn't win much. One thing I learned from that experience is that one great player 9 (at least in his own mind) can't beat a team. An eye injury ended my pro career before it began, to this day I still have floaters in my eyes because of the injury. I started wearing glasses, but the problem never went away. On t...
Read more

Chang Ha-Joon's foolish consistency (Korea Times, January 1, 2013)

By Casey Lartigue, Jr. Is the sky blue? Is the ocean water? If you suspect those are trick questions, you are right. The sky isn’t always blue ― it is reddish at sunset, dark at midnight, gray on an overcast day. The ocean isn’t water ― there’s also fish, plant life, submarines, dissolved minerals, surfboards, sunken ships, even people swimming in it sometimes. As Hoover Institution scholar Thomas Sowell wrote in his 1996 book ``The Vision of the Anointed,” people who use “all-or-nothing” reasoning can deny a statement because it is not 100 percent true in every circumstance. Such word games might be fun for college students or debaters, but there are some distinguished people who are respected for making such childish arguments about serious issues. In his book ``23 Things They Don’t Tell you About Capitalism,” Cambridge University economist Chang Ha-Joon argues that 1) “[T]here is really no such thing as a free market” and 2) “The free market doesn’t exis...
Read more