Skip to main content

To Donate, Investigate (The Korea Times, March 11, 2014) by Casey Lartigue, Jr.

To donate, investigate
By Casey Lartigue, Jr.  

When I give public speeches based on my Korea Times opinion piece, 
“To be a good volunteer, use your brain” (Dec. 5, 2012), I typically start by daring the “good” volunteers to stand up. I angrily stare at the ones who do, dismissing them as “a bunch of liars.” I then ask the “lousy” volunteers to stand up; I warmly congratulate them for being honest.

It is an ice-breaker that brings chuckles but has a serious point: There are some lousy volunteers. I don’t mean extreme cases like negligent volunteers losing kids during field trips or lazy ones watching the clock waiting for lunch to start. I’m talking about typical volunteers who don’t think about how they can add value beyond being a warm body.

I’ve been doing voluntary work for more than a decade and have served on the boards of directors of several organizations. I start sharpening my knives when prospective volunteers ask, “How can I help?” I typically respond “Who are you?” I politely tell them I am as mystified as they are about how they can help because I don’t know their interests or skills. At the end of every speech, people have told me they have been inspired to become thoughtful volunteers.

A few others have followed up to ask, in the words of one caring friend: “But what if I don’t know how to use my brain?” So I give recent examples of what I mean. Sarah Shechner, the owner of the horse farm Grace Stables in Indeokwon, and her assistant manager Ko Sung-hee, now give free horse rides to the children studying at the Mulmangcho School (for adolescent North Korean refugees). Mutual friend Sunnie Kim has never visited the school but she put two and two together and connected us (I’m the international adviser to the school). If Sunnie had asked me, “How can I help,” how would I have ever known to ask her to connect me to her friend who owns a horse farm?

I’m always delighted to connect with quick-thinking people. Perhaps they can join me in encouraging donors to use their brains.

Oh, yeah, there are some lousy donors. I don’t mean extreme cases like someone donating loaded guns to toddlers. I mean well-intentioned donors who search for organizations to dump items on organize feel good but not useful activities.

I often receive requests from organizations seeking to hold charitable donation drives, and I often try to help. Certainly there are some uplifting stories. I do wonder, however, if many collection drives are worth the trip.

Which would you choose: (A) Used clothes valued at $5,000 when bought new or (B) $1,000 in cash? I suspect that most people not in the used clothing business would take the cash and call it a day. Why expect organizations staffed by humans to be any different?

I will say aloud what more donors need to hear, but that recipient organizations don’t say often or loudly enough: If you want to help, then give money. Many donated items quietly get dumped, stored away, or “re-donated” (the way people “re-gift” unwanted Christmas presents).

Yeah, I said it. Instead of donation drives, help by raising or giving money. Or include fund-raising along with a donation drive. I’m sure that donation drives can be team building exercises or teach organizational skills. But donation drives usually aren’t wanted by recipients; the supply far exceeds the demand.

I have delivered the “good news” to schools and NGOs about proposed donation drives. Thankfully none have shot this particular messenger. I sense they will take items, even “leftovers,” because they don’t want to seem ungrateful by rejecting well-intentioned offers. Donors should hear the truth: Fundraisers are more desirable.

Here’s my main suggestion to donors who want to be helpful: Engage in “investigative giving.” Instead of an email offering to hold a donation drive, get to know organization leaders and the “doers” on staff. I doubt you’ll hear them suggesting donation drives. Donations that are targeted ― money to pay for rides for volunteers, computers for refugees who have just arrived to the country ― are more helpful than scattershot donation drives.

That kind of “investigative giving” would be the equivalent of a tailor-made suit rather than 10 donated suits of various measurements. If potential recipients know you are truly listening, then they’ll drop clues about things they need ― or may come right out and tell you after they feel comfortable telling you the truth.

So if I ever give a speech before donors, I will ask the “good” ones to stand up. I hope that some veterans of my volunteer activities, speeches and readers of this column will join me in angrily staring at them, playfully calling them liars and then encouraging them to use their brains.

The writer is the international adviser to the Mulmangcho School (for adolescent North Korean refugees) in Yeoju, Korea, the international adviser to HOPE (Helping Others Prosper Through English) in Seoul and a member of the Board of Trustees of the Frederick Douglass Memorial Historical Association in Washington, D.C

 
Donations are great, but can be too much of a great thing...

Popular posts from this blog

"Yoegi Anjuseyo!"

* I have a short reflection in today's Korea Times about an encounter with an unfriendly looking Korean man on the subway. It was a reminder not to be too quick in judging people in Korea. 09-13-2011 16:47 'Yeogi Anjeuseyo!' By Casey Lartigue Jr. The recent incident in which an American English teacher bullied an elderly Korean man and other passengers on the bus reminded me of a more pleasing incident from years ago. I was on the subway, taking the train outside of Seoul for a work assignment. I have the habit of standing on the subway to strategically position myself near the doors in case my stop magically appears. On that particular day, there was a Korean man STARING at me. Not just looking at me, but intensely staring at me. He had an incredible frown on his face. Not just for one stop, but for several stops the guy just kept staring at me. If I had known more Korean then I would have been able to curse him ...

Michael Breen discussion at 10 Magazine

Yesterday I attended a discussion with writer Michael Breen, hosted by Barry Welsh. Very often, when I attend a speech or discussion about a topic I know a lot about, I often think about ways the speaker/facilitator/discussant could have done better. But I didn't feel that way about Breen, it was one of those times that I really felt like I had a lot to learn and should listen more than talk. He's been in Korea for three decades, working as a reporter, commentator, communications specialist. He reminds me of Andrei Lankov in that his analysis seems to be based on observation of how things work rather than trying to get the world to fit his biases. I don't know him, so his friends may say he is a raging ideologue, but that's not the impression I had yesterday and based on his writings. Michael Breen (L) and Casey Lartigue I first read his book The Koreans about a decade ago. It was a delightful read, that was both warm to Koreans but also critical at times. Yes...

Humanitarian with a guillotine (Korea Times, February 1, 2013) by Casey Lartigue, Jr.

Former U.S. President Ronald Reagan said the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, `` I’m from the government, and I’m here to help .” For many well-intentioned activists, politicians, and intellectuals, that should be updated as: ``We are here to help you. You’re under arrest.” For example, ``sex workers” around the world oppose anti-prostitution laws. Prostitutes may not know the theoretical arguments but they do know in reality that prohibiting prostitution means they lack protection in dealing with abusive pimps and madams, violent patrons and crooked cops. Locally, a Korean woman busted for prostitution recently appealed to the courts pleading , ``I cannot survive without this job. I don’t want to be treated as a criminal for making a living the only way I can.” How should someone who genuinely wants to help her respond? If you say ``arrest her” then you are qualified to be a “harmful humanitarian.” In your desire to help, you have elimin...

Inspiration from a lousy visitor (The Korea Times, December 31, 2013) by Casey Lartigue, Jr.

2013-12-15 It was a great occasion yesterday. A group of us held a Christmas party in the cancer ward of severance hospital. So many people to mention. The man who inspired it all: Nick Adams. It was his trip to Korea last month that inspired me to organize the party. He had cancer when he was a child, and he insisted that as part of his itinerary that we stop by the hospital. I was so moved that I contacted the best party planner I have ever known. The man behind the motion: Edward M. Robinson! As I've said several times: If you are looking for someone to hold an incredible party for kids, then contact Eddie! I look forward to big things from HOPE now that he has taken an even more active role with the organization (and was smart enough to name me an International Adviser, for example). The staff members at Mulmangcho are still talking about the incredible Halloween party he hosted, and they are looking forward to the Christmas party he has planned this weekend! The lady behind t...

Rich talking back

The rich are talked about very often in negative terms, but how often do the rich respond in kind? Australian billionaire Gina Rinehart, who inherited most of her money but apparently has also done very well with it, recently railed against class warfare and had some advice for the non-rich : "There is no monopoly on becoming a millionaire," she writes. "If you're jealous of those with more money, don't just sit there and complain. Do something to make more money yourself - spend less time drinking, or smoking and socializing and more time working."   She complained about politicians raising taxes, regulations that slow investment, and other anti-business policies that harm the poor. "If you want to help the poor and our next generation, make investment, reinvenstment and businesses welcome."