|
By Casey Lartigue, Jr.
Have you ever read an article that you knew was
wrong or incomplete based on your inside knowledge? That was the case as I
read a 3,000-word commentary by reporter Mary Ann Jolley challenging
statements by North Korean refugee Park Yeon-mi.
Jolley questioned if Park had really witnessed the execution of a friend's
mother for watching a Hollywood movie, in Hyesan, North Korea. Jolley quoted
North Korea scholar Andrei Lankov who questioned the likelihood of the
account, as well as an unnamed 59-year-old refugee from Hyesan who
"laughed" that such a thing had happened there.
The problem? Park didn't say the execution occurred in Hyesan. I know this
because since last April I have recorded hours of detailed interviews with
Park to help document her story. Park was born in Hyesan and later lived in
Pyongyang, but moved to the countryside after her father was imprisoned.
Because of a sensitive family security issue, Park has avoided mentioning the
exact location of the execution publicly (she told me the location months ago
in a recorded interview).
An investigative reporter writing a balanced article without a tight deadline
might have recognized that missing details before questioning Lankov and
others, but there are deeper issues than simple errors in a hit piece. How
many sensitive details that could put others at risk must refugees reveal?
How much should critics reasonably be allowed to challenge refugees, knowing
a watchful psychotic regime up north is eager to punish "traitors"
like Park?
How many embarrassing personal details must North Korean refugees reveal in
snippets of interviews and speeches? Jolley even questions details about the
burial of Park's father, but I know the story better than she does. Out of
money, options and hope, with her father dying of cancer in China, Park and
her mother agreed to be sold to a Chinese farmer. Park has mentioned such
stories in speeches and interviews and sought to raise awareness without
"sensationalizing" being sold in China.
Park hasn't discussed it publicly, so I will only briefly mention the
"aunt" who brokered the deal and the Chinese man who purchased Park
as his daughter and her mom as his wife; he also agreed to dispose of the
body of Park's father upon his death. Jolley didn't know about the purchase
of Park and her mother, and other important details, which is why her
3,000-word attack couldn't help but be incomplete, at best.
When Jolley gets things half-right, she concludes the worst about Park. She
cites an exchange during our podcast "North Korea Today, featuring Casey
and Yeonmi." We had been invited to do a special live podcast in front
of an audience at an exhibition about North Korean street children. Park
wanted to avoid overshadowing the street children feature with her own story.
Jolley twists this to even question if Park had ever eaten grass or
dragonflies because she didn't mention it then. We did a separate podcast in
which Park talked in detail about eating dragonflies, wild boar,
grasshoppers, and sparrows when she was in North Korea.
Jolley clearly missed or ignored that, as well as many other things, in her
well-researched article of dots she (understandably so, sometimes)
misconnected. In July, Jolley flew into Seoul with a camera, interviewed Park
and people around her (including me), then flew out with a big part of the
story, but not the sensitive parts that Park wasn't then prepared to discuss
on camera.
Unexpectedly emerging as a public figure without a manager and in a language
she is still learning, Park has struggled with how to tell the rest of her
often embarrassing story while maintaining security and family privacy. It
will fall on deaf ears in this instant-news age, but my suggestion: please
wait for Park to tell the rest of her story.
Most refugees change their names, are paranoid about their photos being
posted publicly and live in terror of being identified by the regime. Some of
Jolley's anonymous refugee sources fear reprisal over a simple article. Park
uses her real name, courageously speaks out against the regime, and reveals
many personal details that get more scrutinized than presidential executive
orders.
Conspiracy theorists, North Korean regime sympathizers, and the usual
skeptical researchers and disgruntled bloggers are parsing her every word in
her third, and only recently learned, language. Park, 21, has been targeted
by the North Korean regime and warned by South Korean law enforcement she is
putting her family at risk.
Park's critics have even come after me. More than a month before the world
learned it, Park told me in a recorded interview about her mother being raped
in China. Despite the opportunity for fame and fortune, I didn't take the
opportunities to reveal her sensitive information. I will keep Park's
security and privacy issues in mind, but I can in good conscience break my
silence and respond to critics with attacks full of half-truths and
incomplete information.
The writer is director for international relations at Freedom Factory Co.
in Seoul, and the Asia Outreach Fellow with the Atlas Network in Washington,
D.C. He can be reached at CJL@post.harvard.edu. The views and opinions
expressed in the above article are entirely those of the author and do not in
any way reflect the thoughts and perspectives of staff at The Korea Times. —
ED.
|