I joined a wonderful event hosted by Database Centre For North Korean Human Rights (NKDB). But as often happens at events, I spent more time talking OUTSIDE rather than participating in the event. That is only a problem when I'm the host, and people are looking for me. :-)
Tonight, I was a free agent, meeting, talking. I was surprised by the number of people who said they follow my Facebook posts. And a few, yes, I felt like I was a star/someone important because of the way they treated me, were so happy to meet me.
My former Cato Institute colleague Bob Levy is profiled by the Associated Press for his role in the challenge to the DC gun ban. One great thing about Levy is that he tells it like it is. As the article quotes: And Levy freely admits the case is manufactured, not one that bubbled up by chance from the district's steady flow of criminal cases involving guns. He wanted presentable plaintiffs to make a case for gun rights, not criminals. "We didn't want crack heads and bank robbers to be poster boys for the Second Amendment," he said. Is there a problem with this case being manufactured? I heard a talking head on the radio complaining a while ago that this case wasn't from real DC residents, that it was from outsiders. What's wrong with that? There may be some times that it takes an outsider to challenge an injustice or bad law. Did DC residents claim that Martin Luther King Jr. was an outsider who should have minded his own business? And about the case being ...














