Skip to main content

Burn Your Own Flag, If You Want

by Casey Lartigue

This article appeared on cato.org on August 1, 2001.



The House voted 298-125 on July 17 for a one-sentence amendment to the U.S. Constitution: "The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States."

Why did Congress stop there? The amendment needs to be expanded to read: "The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States that anyone in Congress happens to own. Anyone who burns a flag stolen from the home or office of a member of Congress shall be punished to the maximum extent of the law."

In other words, hold flag burners to the same standard we hold people to when they burn property that is not their own: you burn it, you buy it.


Congress needs to fight fire with fire by responding to the symbolic act of burning Old Glory with symbolic action of its own--each new Congress should pass a non-binding resolution, call it Resolution 1776 this time, condemning flag burning. They'll have a chance to condemn flag burning without incinerating the First Amendment.

The resolution is needed because it has become a tradition for the House to prove its devotion to freedom by restricting freedom. The goal has been to overturn the Supreme Court's 1989 and 1990 decisions slapping down state and federal attempts to criminalize flag burning. If the flag burning amendment becomes law, it would mark the first time that the First Amendment has ever been amended. That would surely set off a bonfire by interest groups demanding that disliked words, texts, and ideas be criminalized.

In their desperation, some enflamed representatives have even referred to flag burning as a hate crime. Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif.) and many others who denounce flag burning as a hate crime have themselves been MIA on the issue of hate crimes.

During House debate on flag burning, Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill. argued: "Vandalizing a no-parking sign is a misdemeanor, but burning a flag is a hate crime, because burning the flag is an expression of contempt for the moral unity of the American people."

Hyde has, however, created a false analogy -- -a flag can be privately owned whereas no-parking signs are public property. If someone happens to own a no-parking sign, then he should certainly be allowed to burn it, as long as he doesn't endanger others or their property.

Fiery columnist Patrick Buchanan said in 1989 that the Supreme Court had "converted an anti-American `hate crime' into a constitutional right." In contrast, Buchanan calls hate crime legislation a "fraud." After the murder of a gay man in 1998, Buchanan argued: "Since Wyoming is prepared to execute the killers, what more does the left want? Answer: The left wants the thought punished as well as the deed."

While Buchanan is right that hate crime laws are unnecessary, he borrows from the logic of opponents by arguing that some thoughts need to be punished. He doesn't oppose flags being destroyed in a dignified manner, just when some pinkos barbecue the Red, White and Blue. Perhaps Buchanan will next borrow from his ideological opponents by asking for reparations for those traumatized by flag burners.

There wouldn't be many people in need of such reparations, however. According to the Library of Congress, there were only 45 instances of flag burning from 1777 to 1989, and fewer than 10 a year since the Supreme Court' s rulings. The reality is that not many Americans burn the American flag, although conservatives are willing to trample on the Constitution to save the flag.

What should be embarrassing for conservatives is that they have Rep. Jesse Jackson (D-Ill.) mocking them for trying to amend the Constitution. Jackson isn't opposed to aggressively amending the Constitution. In his book to be released in mid-August, Jackson proposes eight constitutional amendments. But according to Jackson, conservatives have even topped him, having already introduced about 50 constitutional amendments in the 107th Congress. The supposedly do-nothing conservatives in the 106th Congress introduced 75 constitutional amendments. The founding fathers themselves only came up with a dozen amendments, 10 of which they ratified.

Our elected representatives need to think beyond the next election. Harvard Law professor Charles Fried, in testimony before a Senate committee in 1990, said that putting the flag burning amendment in the Constitution would be like drawing "a moustache on the Mona Lisa of our liberties." Fried, then solicitor general in the Reagan administration, said "It would be 'a piece of vandalism whose mark will be with us forever.'"

Popular posts from this blog

Does a flower turn to the sun?

I tend not to address points raised by people commenting on posts. In the back-and-forth of such discussions, people sometimes say things they don't mean or take extreme positions. In other cases they are just trying to be provocative, especially when they can remain anonymous. But a discussion on Greg Mankiw's blog caught my attention. That's because a couple of the folks suggested that parents don't really have the knowledge to make decisions about the quality of schools. Between 2002-2004 I was actively involved in the fight to get school vouchers for families in DC. I often heard the argument that parents don't know how to choose between good and bad schools and that, anyway, parents had enough choices with the school system's "out-of-boundary" options and charters (that had also been opposed). Without getting too deep into the out-of-boundary program, I'll point out that Woodrow Wilson HS, considered one of the best schools in the city, recei...
Read more

Common Sense on North Korea (Korea Times, April 2, 2012)

By Casey Lartigue, Jr. As interesting as Kookmin University professor Andrei Lankov’s writings are, there is nothing quite like attending one of his lectures. He can barely restrain himself behind the podium, often pointing and waving his arms. I also enjoy his unscripted speeches, but his answers in Q&A sessions are like the difference between watching Michael Jordan shoot baskets in warm-ups and an actual game. I have finally discovered the secret behind Lankov’s consistently solid analysis about North Korea: Use common sense. At an Asan Institute conference last summer, he argued that North Korea watchers should try to understand North Korea from its perspective. Don’t most people know that you must understand the mindset of others you are dealing with? Yet, common sense in theory gets ignored politically. From the North Korean perspective, nuclear weapons are the best thing they’ve got going. They will NOT give them up easily, even if President Obama ...
Read more

Park Jin welcoming remarks to FSI (and Casey Lartigue)

  National Assembly member Park Jin makes the welcoming remarks at FSI's conference featuring North Korean diplomats. Park Jin | Greeting message to FSI and Casey Lartigue mention - YouTube
Read more

2018-09-28 Not everyone at KFC cooks chickens

Most of the people who contact us at TNKR naturally want to tutor North Korean refugees. Many potential volunteers are shocked shocked shock ed to learn that they can volunteer with TNKR in other ways. I tell many of them: "Not everyone at KFC cooks chickens. There are also delivery people, accountants, marketers, personnel, and a host of other positions." Earlier this year, we began developing the TNKR Volunteer Leadership Academy. I'm still waiting for someone to take over that little project. Until then, I will continue with developing it. And be developing it, I mean telling people, "Don't write me a long business plan about what you would like to do. Just start doing it, keep me updated and in the conversations, then let's talk and update." We have had a recent influx of volunteers who want to help TNKR in other ways. Jackie Cole is now running our Instagram. She constantly surprises me with the flyers and videos she posts. I made it clear from the ...
Read more

Freedom Factory Shareholder Meeting (2015-01-31)

  Re: Building something out of nothing Freedom Factory is a very small company, of which I am a shareholder.  Yesterday we had our annual shareholder meeting. Freedom Factory is allowing us to "incubate" TNKR until we can stand on our two own feet--or at least crawl on our four hands and feet. (Consumer Rights Watch is in the same position).  I owe special thanks to FF CEO 김정호. He is a "true believer" in the cause of freedom, so he is allowing both projects to grow out of FF. That's even though Freedom Factory is a small start up with the CEO, staff and supporters wondering how we are going to achieve our dreams with such a tight budget.  So when I say I am so thankful to the volunteers and donors of TNKR, it isn't just lip service. Volunteers--along with Freedom Factory, the Atlas Network, donors--are helping us to create something out of nothing, helping North Korean refugees find their own way and tell their own stories. Like the FF CEO, I also don...
Read more