Skip to main content

2013-10-20 Documentary recording


Thanks to the ever-alert Aaron McKenzie, I know that I am in a PBS documentary. “Economic Freedom in Action: Changing Lives.” It is always nice to be on TV or on movie theater screens, although I rarely watch TV or frequent movie theaters.

But what I am most proud of us is not the handful of seconds that I am on screen. Rather, it is that I am the one who guided the documentary directors in the direction of focusing on North Korea. They had asked me to give them advice for a 15 minute segment on economic freedom in South Korea that was going to be part of a larger documentary.

In my response, I told them that I could help them with that, but that I had a better idea: North Koreans! I had enough contacts here that I could them find some interesting stories to choose from. They weren’t immediately convinced, I’m sure the projects had been in works for a while (raising the financing or funding, getting approval from PBS or other decision-makers). They got back to me, but it was clear that the pressure was on me to come up with some good stuff. And I did!

They loved Andrei Lankov. Only a bit of what he talked about can be shown in the documentary, but he was saying some profound things in his usual animated and no-nonsense way. He gave them clarity that filled in many gaps for them.

김정호 said some really great things to put many things in perspective from an economic viewpoint.

The North Korean businessman was courageous. He had no fear in talking about the topics. His strength caused them to bump some other stories. We wanted to be sure that he would understand that he would be featured, that his name and business would be mentioned in America. He was fine with it. We visited some of the businesses he has helped to start up. Really inspiring stories.

In particular, I enjoyed the visits to the small grocery store as well as the restaurant (the businessman insisted on paying dinner, they fed us with the most expensive things on the menu).

They also wanted to quote me in the documentary, I was delighted. I’m not a major player on North Korean issues, I tend to be a bit pragmatic with my efforts, not engaging in the big issues (nukes, six-party talks). I let them know I would be fine if they quoted me just once, briefly, so I could say I had been on PBS. What I wanted was for them to include as many of the people they had interviewed that I had booked to be in the documentary. So when you see me on screen, you see a man who is delighted that he turned the tide of this documentary to focus on North Korea and to feature some stories about North Korean refugees struggling for freedom.

It was such a great experience, so I am delighted to see the documentary will be shown in America and that a segment of it is available at the Cato Institute Website. Aaron mentioned that I was in the documentary from the 28 minute mark, I am wondering if my former colleagues at Cato thought to mention that I used to be a policy analyst at Cato.













Popular posts from this blog

"Yoegi Anjuseyo!"

* I have a short reflection in today's Korea Times about an encounter with an unfriendly looking Korean man on the subway. It was a reminder not to be too quick in judging people in Korea. 09-13-2011 16:47 'Yeogi Anjeuseyo!' By Casey Lartigue Jr. The recent incident in which an American English teacher bullied an elderly Korean man and other passengers on the bus reminded me of a more pleasing incident from years ago. I was on the subway, taking the train outside of Seoul for a work assignment. I have the habit of standing on the subway to strategically position myself near the doors in case my stop magically appears. On that particular day, there was a Korean man STARING at me. Not just looking at me, but intensely staring at me. He had an incredible frown on his face. Not just for one stop, but for several stops the guy just kept staring at me. If I had known more Korean then I would have been able to curse him ...

Rich talking back

The rich are talked about very often in negative terms, but how often do the rich respond in kind? Australian billionaire Gina Rinehart, who inherited most of her money but apparently has also done very well with it, recently railed against class warfare and had some advice for the non-rich : "There is no monopoly on becoming a millionaire," she writes. "If you're jealous of those with more money, don't just sit there and complain. Do something to make more money yourself - spend less time drinking, or smoking and socializing and more time working."   She complained about politicians raising taxes, regulations that slow investment, and other anti-business policies that harm the poor. "If you want to help the poor and our next generation, make investment, reinvenstment and businesses welcome."

Humanitarian with a guillotine (Korea Times, February 1, 2013) by Casey Lartigue, Jr.

Former U.S. President Ronald Reagan said the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, `` I’m from the government, and I’m here to help .” For many well-intentioned activists, politicians, and intellectuals, that should be updated as: ``We are here to help you. You’re under arrest.” For example, ``sex workers” around the world oppose anti-prostitution laws. Prostitutes may not know the theoretical arguments but they do know in reality that prohibiting prostitution means they lack protection in dealing with abusive pimps and madams, violent patrons and crooked cops. Locally, a Korean woman busted for prostitution recently appealed to the courts pleading , ``I cannot survive without this job. I don’t want to be treated as a criminal for making a living the only way I can.” How should someone who genuinely wants to help her respond? If you say ``arrest her” then you are qualified to be a “harmful humanitarian.” In your desire to help, you have elimin...

2014-02-14 Yeon-Mi Park`s debut

Yeonmi Park, February 14, 2014, making her debut! Yesterday I was one of the speakers at a special session on North Korean refugees at the Canadian Maple International School. Wow, it was a wonderful time! * Yeon-Mi Park delivered her first major speech in English. She was wonderful! She told her story (35 minute speech without notes), discussed different aspects of North Korea, and then handled questions from students for more than an hour. She did seem to be nervous at the beginning-she took a deep breath just as she started, looked at me, then told her story from her heart. * Returning from the speech, I told Yeonmi that she had star potential. She told me that she didn't believe it, but I told her that the way she handled Q&A and told her story, I would be lucky to have her still returning my phone calls within a year. * The students had many questions. They have been learning about North Korea. They are now reading "Escape from Camp 14" featuring Shin Dong-h...

Manufactured cases

My former Cato Institute colleague Bob Levy is profiled by the Associated Press for his role in the challenge to the DC gun ban. One great thing about Levy is that he tells it like it is. As the article quotes: And Levy freely admits the case is manufactured, not one that bubbled up by chance from the district's steady flow of criminal cases involving guns. He wanted presentable plaintiffs to make a case for gun rights, not criminals. "We didn't want crack heads and bank robbers to be poster boys for the Second Amendment," he said. Is there a problem with this case being manufactured? I heard a talking head on the radio complaining a while ago that this case wasn't from real DC residents, that it was from outsiders. What's wrong with that? There may be some times that it takes an outsider to challenge an injustice or bad law. Did DC residents claim that Martin Luther King Jr. was an outsider who should have minded his own business? And about the case being ...