Skip to main content

2019-12-15 Optimistic Discussion Group

:-)

I had a great time at a discussion group yesterday. One of the members said she was amazed that even though I talk about serious issues, I do so with a smile on my face.

There are three main reasons:


1) I do something about issues that bother me, not just talking talking talking about it.

I am constantly amazed by the number of people who talk about a problem without moving to do a single thing about it, apparently mistaking their words for action.

They can talk about politics, education, social policy, the poverty level, welfare, etc., posting a number of links and articles, eager to pounce on others who disagree with their endless words. Then when you ask what they have done, they get huffy. And if they are young, they will dismiss you with whatever saying young smart-asses enjoy saying these days.

They can talk about minimum wage all day, post links to studies proving their belief, condemn employers who actually risk their own capital to hire businesses employing others--but they would have never hired anyone in a business they started.

From a young age, I loved James Brown's song "Talking loud, saying nothing." My one edit would be that many people are "Talking loud, doing nothing."

2) At a deeper level, I have known since I was a young boy that I would die one day. It was terrifying but also liberating. I won't live forever, but from some unknown day, I will be dead forever. Yes, there could be a heaven, to which I would proudly celebrate with a dance lasting for an eternity: "Bonus time, baby!!!"

As an adult, that has meant I don't take things seriously, especially when it comes to people's ideology, theories and chit-chat that make me feel like I'm talking with college sophomores, but I do have fun doing what I enjoy. As has been attributed to Emma Goldman: "If I can't dance, then I don't want to join your revolution."

***

When I heard about the book "The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck," my response was, "Damn, I could have written that." Well, maybe not, because I probably wouldn't have finished it, thinking that readers wouldn't give a damn, either.

***

There are so many jacket-pullers in this world discouraging people from having fun. I have never taken a selfie by myself but will join others when they ask--I am still amazed by people complaining about other people taking selfies. Some whiners complain about other people allegedly taking too many photos. Some other whiners complain that others post about their lives too often, that others are show-offs, that people are engaged in self-promotion. A few years ago I even heard someone complaining about something called a "humble brag."

As H.L. Mencken said: "Puritanism is the haunting fear that someone somewhere may be having a good time."

I am having fun doing what I enjoy, and I have fun talking about it. It is amazing that I can work a 14 hour day, have endless meetings, endless planning, speeches, events, answering messages and questions from reporters--if I take a few minutes to post a few photos or comments then I have people complaining (to each other).

Indeed, there are too many jacket-pullers in the world, trying to slow others down, telling them to stop having fun. If you don't like that I like that I said, please block yourselves, or let me know so I can block you wherever possible.

***

I participate in a couple of discussion groups, it is fun to get away from my serious work to just chit-chat. Well, I try. Of course I often end up talking about TNKR, and encouraging people to do something, rather than just talking. It didn't have to be my cause, but why not do something about all of the things we talk about?

Yesterday I hosted a discussion group hosted by Van Hur. The discussion was, again, so lovely, fun, and even when there was disagreement, it was in good fun.

One member even identified an apparent contradiction about me: I am talking about serious issues, with a smile on my face. As I explained: "I am doing something about it." When I talk about issues, I am not talking about the way things ought to be--I am talking about what I am doing, what has been done, how others can get involved. Even if they don't like my cause, they can go beyond just talking about issues they care about. Some people think they can tweet their way to freedom or improvements in the world. People can certainly be inspired by words, but the real work to make change comes later.

Apparently I am not supposed to smile about it. A few years ago I joined a protest, holding a protest sign. People on Social Media were saying I shouldn't be smiling. I mean, I was out in the street, and the critics were typing from their basements or offices. I invited them to join me, to come frown as they wish, but to do something rather than analyzing.

I am still behind the times of the emoji generation. On Social Media, people post the appropriate emoji to show their happiness or sadness. It took me a while to understand that I need to put emojis to show my feeling. I might have actually DONE something, but lacking an emoji, people might get the wrong idea.

:-)

***

The third reason I can talk about serious issues and engage in serious activities while having fun? I work directly with people who appreciate what I am doing. Every week, I have North Korean refugees telling me how much they appreciate TNKR and what I am doing. Those who can't tell me in English will tell Eunkoo or others. I have been called Pretty Flower Man, had North Korean refugees and others hail me as a hero, North Korean refugee author Yeonmi Park says that I changed her life.

There aren't a lot of people in the world who get thanked for what they do. There are some people who deal with others who are constantly criticizing them, angry and disgruntled along with them, or they only hear from people when the people want to complain.

Why not enjoy even this serious work I am doing when I receive such praise and words of affirmation?

:-)






Popular posts from this blog

"Yoegi Anjuseyo!"

* I have a short reflection in today's Korea Times about an encounter with an unfriendly looking Korean man on the subway. It was a reminder not to be too quick in judging people in Korea. 09-13-2011 16:47 'Yeogi Anjeuseyo!' By Casey Lartigue Jr. The recent incident in which an American English teacher bullied an elderly Korean man and other passengers on the bus reminded me of a more pleasing incident from years ago. I was on the subway, taking the train outside of Seoul for a work assignment. I have the habit of standing on the subway to strategically position myself near the doors in case my stop magically appears. On that particular day, there was a Korean man STARING at me. Not just looking at me, but intensely staring at me. He had an incredible frown on his face. Not just for one stop, but for several stops the guy just kept staring at me. If I had known more Korean then I would have been able to curse him ...

Rich talking back

The rich are talked about very often in negative terms, but how often do the rich respond in kind? Australian billionaire Gina Rinehart, who inherited most of her money but apparently has also done very well with it, recently railed against class warfare and had some advice for the non-rich : "There is no monopoly on becoming a millionaire," she writes. "If you're jealous of those with more money, don't just sit there and complain. Do something to make more money yourself - spend less time drinking, or smoking and socializing and more time working."   She complained about politicians raising taxes, regulations that slow investment, and other anti-business policies that harm the poor. "If you want to help the poor and our next generation, make investment, reinvenstment and businesses welcome."

Humanitarian with a guillotine (Korea Times, February 1, 2013) by Casey Lartigue, Jr.

Former U.S. President Ronald Reagan said the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, `` I’m from the government, and I’m here to help .” For many well-intentioned activists, politicians, and intellectuals, that should be updated as: ``We are here to help you. You’re under arrest.” For example, ``sex workers” around the world oppose anti-prostitution laws. Prostitutes may not know the theoretical arguments but they do know in reality that prohibiting prostitution means they lack protection in dealing with abusive pimps and madams, violent patrons and crooked cops. Locally, a Korean woman busted for prostitution recently appealed to the courts pleading , ``I cannot survive without this job. I don’t want to be treated as a criminal for making a living the only way I can.” How should someone who genuinely wants to help her respond? If you say ``arrest her” then you are qualified to be a “harmful humanitarian.” In your desire to help, you have elimin...

2014-02-14 Yeon-Mi Park`s debut

Yeonmi Park, February 14, 2014, making her debut! Yesterday I was one of the speakers at a special session on North Korean refugees at the Canadian Maple International School. Wow, it was a wonderful time! * Yeon-Mi Park delivered her first major speech in English. She was wonderful! She told her story (35 minute speech without notes), discussed different aspects of North Korea, and then handled questions from students for more than an hour. She did seem to be nervous at the beginning-she took a deep breath just as she started, looked at me, then told her story from her heart. * Returning from the speech, I told Yeonmi that she had star potential. She told me that she didn't believe it, but I told her that the way she handled Q&A and told her story, I would be lucky to have her still returning my phone calls within a year. * The students had many questions. They have been learning about North Korea. They are now reading "Escape from Camp 14" featuring Shin Dong-h...

Manufactured cases

My former Cato Institute colleague Bob Levy is profiled by the Associated Press for his role in the challenge to the DC gun ban. One great thing about Levy is that he tells it like it is. As the article quotes: And Levy freely admits the case is manufactured, not one that bubbled up by chance from the district's steady flow of criminal cases involving guns. He wanted presentable plaintiffs to make a case for gun rights, not criminals. "We didn't want crack heads and bank robbers to be poster boys for the Second Amendment," he said. Is there a problem with this case being manufactured? I heard a talking head on the radio complaining a while ago that this case wasn't from real DC residents, that it was from outsiders. What's wrong with that? There may be some times that it takes an outsider to challenge an injustice or bad law. Did DC residents claim that Martin Luther King Jr. was an outsider who should have minded his own business? And about the case being ...