Skip to main content

A wink as harassment? Teaching lions to become vegetarians


1) A few days ago when I was on the subway in Seoul, I was so tempted to take a photo. All of the people seated in a row of seats? Males. Everyone standing up? Females.

I typically stand up on the subway so I will be positioned to hop off. Those rare times I sit, I have noticed that when I do stand up, a Korean male will quickly scurry to claim the seat. Guys, it is polite to allow a lady to sit--even if you don't want to give up your seat, at least you don't have to elbow a woman out of the way to claim a seat.

But I have changed my mind. 

2) I want to apologize to those Korean guys I have complained about.  

Eun-jung Chung has come into my life. She just wrote an incoherent commentary in the Korea Times complaining about some expat businessmen winking at her. I think that is her point, please excuse me for not being able to differentiate between garbage and trash. 

She says she responded to the expat with a middle finger.
 
Dear reader, you won't hurt my feelings by explaining to me what in the hell was her point, why it is important--and why anyone besides her friends, family, and work colleagues needed to know it. Of course, Korean males who stand on the subway aren't thinking about her when they continue sitting on the subway. I will be, however. 

If she complains about a man winking at her then she is likely to complain about other things men do. Smiling at her? Asking her to sit on the subway?

3) My first thought was that she is out of her mind. But it may just be that she is a lousy writer and thinker.

4) I was a graduate student the first time I heard about something called "lookism." I first burst out laughing, then ridiculed it, but knew it was an important moment. One thing I have learned over the years--once someone comes up with an idea or policy then it will never disappear. It may be ridiculed at first, but other people will start to believe in it, and at some point it will even enter the mainstream. It doesn't matter how many people get slaughtered by socialists, there will always be socialists plaguing humanity.

5) Back when I was a student participating in a "take back the night" workshop, I said two things that almost turned the workshop into a riot. The first is so controversial that I won't talk about it now, but the second one also got the people at the workshop upset: Not only do men need to be taught to respect the individual space of women, but women also need to be taught to respect the individual space of women. Women need to claim ownership of their bodies--and not just when they are chanting at a pro-choice abortion rally.

Telling women they are responsible for protecting themselves didn't go over very well. I see posters saying that a woman isn't asking for rape because of the way she is dressed. I absolutely agree and have made this point to guys ("Even if she wants 'play rape' or 'real rape," that doesn't mean she wants your ugly ass to do it.") So I get that.

The problem? All of the advice, the focus of the conversation, is addressed to men. That is like having a seminar teaching lions not to eat deer. I agree, but as I tried to argue at that workshop, aren't there also some lessons that women need to hear?

So many of the sexual assaults in America (and probably other countries) are against women younger than 30 years of age. Inexcusable, but it makes sense that it happens more often among younger people. Those are prime dating years, years in which eager and horny young men and women are figuring out who they will be, are going to drinking parties. Some of them may even wink at each other. Yes, let's teach the lions not to eat the deer, but aren't there some lessons to teach the deer?

6) Okay, I'm just kidding. I will still offer a seat to women. One excuse is that I was born and raised in Texas where it was considered polite. A second excuse is that any of those women could be going through that time of the month and may appreciate sitting instead of standing. Third...well, it just seems nice to be considerate of women.

Damn you, Eun-jung Chung, for making me cynical about this. I try to remember to do what I think is the right thing, even when some sophisticated person tries to argue me out of it. Despite your best effort, Ms. Chung, to make me cynical about women, I will still try to be a gentleman. Chivalry may not be dead, but it is dying--and feminists are helping to kill it off.

7) Dear Eun-jung Chung,





Regards,

Casey Lartigue, Jr.

And her response?










A wink and a smile by Harry Connick Jr., dedicated to Ms. Chung



Linked by the Marmot's Hole,

Popular posts from this blog

The Casey Lartigue Show

Guests scheduled for May NOTE: Check here for updates on Memorandum 46! Future Shows Thomas Sowell of the Hoover Institution This is my first attempt at putting together my own promo , it was rejected because of the sound quality May 19 edition of the Casey Lartigue Show We had a great show yesterday, probably the best so far. The topic: Malcolm X. The occasion? Anniversary of his 82nd birthday. Eliot Morgan and I had a great time talking with the callers. Deneen Borelli called in on our special guest line. You can download the file here. We posed the question: What did Malcolm X do? We contrasted the viewpoint and legacies of Malcolm X and Thurgood Marshall. The one mistake I made was not to focus on the question that Marshall asked: What was the one concrete thing that Malcolm X did. In segment 3, callers begin to get personal with us. May 12 edition of the Casey Lartigue Show Featured guest: Don Boudreaux of George Mason University Promo for the May 12 show May 5 edition of the C...

Does a flower turn to the sun?

I tend not to address points raised by people commenting on posts. In the back-and-forth of such discussions, people sometimes say things they don't mean or take extreme positions. In other cases they are just trying to be provocative, especially when they can remain anonymous. But a discussion on Greg Mankiw's blog caught my attention. That's because a couple of the folks suggested that parents don't really have the knowledge to make decisions about the quality of schools. Between 2002-2004 I was actively involved in the fight to get school vouchers for families in DC. I often heard the argument that parents don't know how to choose between good and bad schools and that, anyway, parents had enough choices with the school system's "out-of-boundary" options and charters (that had also been opposed). Without getting too deep into the out-of-boundary program, I'll point out that Woodrow Wilson HS, considered one of the best schools in the city, recei...

Korea Fighting!

Years ago I read an article about a man who kept a detailed diary about his life. I think it was 70 years of diaries. Nothing was too insignificant for him to mention. I remember reading it and wondering, "Yeah, but will anyone ever read those boxes of diaries about him going to the bathroom?" I guess he often wrote about himself writing... These days I'm having the opposite problem... I'm living it up so much that I don't have time to write... Can you really enjoy life and record it all? If I had time I would blog about... * going swing dancing * getting treated at the Kkunnori restaurant in Jamsil by two friends who insist I'm the luckiest man alive because I know them. * then getting treated to an hour or two at the Luxury noraebang near Kkunnori . * the "call" button in Korean restaurants * Koreans ordering too much food whenever they eat together * Meeting with Gong Byeong Ho (공병호) for the first time in 10 years. * how damn energetic Seoul i...

Common Sense on North Korea (Korea Times, April 2, 2012)

By Casey Lartigue, Jr. As interesting as Kookmin University professor Andrei Lankov’s writings are, there is nothing quite like attending one of his lectures. He can barely restrain himself behind the podium, often pointing and waving his arms. I also enjoy his unscripted speeches, but his answers in Q&A sessions are like the difference between watching Michael Jordan shoot baskets in warm-ups and an actual game. I have finally discovered the secret behind Lankov’s consistently solid analysis about North Korea: Use common sense. At an Asan Institute conference last summer, he argued that North Korea watchers should try to understand North Korea from its perspective. Don’t most people know that you must understand the mindset of others you are dealing with? Yet, common sense in theory gets ignored politically. From the North Korean perspective, nuclear weapons are the best thing they’ve got going. They will NOT give them up easily, even if President Obama ...

Double Dog Daring Dellinger

Heller has been heard by the Supreme Court, now the justices will read and re-read briefs, and conference, and supposedly give us some kind of decision in June.  To reiterate my prediction:  Ban overturned, reasonable restrictions allowed, probably "rational" scrutiny of any laws, and no major effect nationally. That said, and setting aside my concerns about the court's treatment of  Miller , as something for another day, I was interested in this bit : In addition to the handgun ban, Washington also has a trigger lock requirement for other guns that raised some concerns Tuesday. "When you hear somebody crawling in your bedroom window, you can run to your gun, unlock it, load it and then fire?" Justice Antonin Scalia said. Roberts, who has two young children, suggested at one point that trigger locks might be reasonable. "There is always a risk that the children will get up and grab the firearm and use it for some purpose other than what the Second Amendme...